Requirements for Assessment Indicators (Metrics): from the Experience in Research in the EMERCOM of Russia, Development of KPIs and data Analysis
Abstract
The article continues the author's previous work in the field of developing requirements and characteristics of assessment indicators and metrics. In addition to the revised list of requirements, based on experience in assessing and planning processes in the field of public administration, two more lists are proposed. The first originates in the development of key performance indicators (KPI). The source of the characteristics from the second list is experience in the field of data analysis and handling.
The purpose of the work is to form, based on the research experience in the EMERCOM of Russia, the development of KPIs and the analysis of data from an updated list of general requirements for assessment indicators in order to improve the quality of the latter.
The main research method is a critical analysis of the author's own research experience, his experience in the field of data analysis, as well as the analysis of literary sources in the field of KPI development and data analysis. The results obtained can be used when choosing the composition of indicators as part of any implementation of the assessment procedure (or preparation for such procedure).
Keywords
assessment,
assessment indicator,
criterion,
characteristics,
requirement,
quality,
KPI,
data analysis
About the Author
V. V. Artyukhin
All-Russian Scientific Research Institute for Civil Defence and Emergencies of the EMERCOM of Russia (Federal Science and High Technology Center)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Valerii V. Artyukhin
Davydkovskaya str., 7, Moscow, 121352
References
1. Artukhin V.V., Chiasnavichius Yu.K. About generalized criteria of indexes of assessment / Issues of Risk Analysis. 2019;16(5): 82–85. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.32686/1812-5220-2019-16-5-82-85
2. Artukhin V.V., Chiasnavichius Ju.K. On dangers of hierarchical aggregation // Journal of Applied Informatics. 2018;13(6):71–77. (In Russ.)
3. Artukhin V.V. Risk, probability and cognition. // Issues of Risk Analysis. 2022;19(5):90–97. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.32686/1812-5220-2022-19-5-90-97
4. Artukhin V.V. On the shortcomings of the consequences assessing methods in the event of man-made emergencies for the use in operational activities // Civil Security Technologies. 2023;20(1):79–82. (In Russ.)
5. Oltyan I. Yu., Arefeva E.V., Artyukhin V.V., [et al.] Methodological approach for the forecast value estimation of the composite index characterizing the system measures state for the preparation and for protection the population, material and cultural values on the territories of the Russian Federation’s subjects in emergency situations // Civil Security Technologies. 2020;17(2):4–13. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.54234/CST.19968493.2020.17.2.64.1.4
6. Chiasnavichius J. Approaches to optimizing the staff specialists of the EMERCOM of Russia in the field of supervision activities // International Journal of Applied Sciences and Technology Integral. 2023;(6). (In Russ.)
7. Trunova E.V. Motivation by KPI in the industrial enterprise: basic approach and main requirements // Vestnik BGTU im. V.G. Shukhova. 2017;(2):242–247. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.12737/24191
Review
For citations:
Artyukhin V.V. Requirements for Assessment Indicators (Metrics): from the Experience in Research in the EMERCOM of Russia, Development of KPIs and data Analysis. Issues of Risk Analysis. 2024;21(3):78-85. (In Russ.)
Views:
151
Email this article 