Risks of the Relationship between Man and Technology
https://doi.org/10.32686/1812-5220-2021-18-1-16-31
Abstract
The article deals with aspects of human-technology relations, the influence of high technologies on modern society and human beings in particular.
About the Author
Yu. I. Sokolov
Russian Scientific Society for Risk Analysis
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yury I. Sokolov
Krylatsky Hills, 30, bldg 4, Moscow, 121614
References
1. Ellule J. Another revolution. Translation into Russian: V. V. Bibikhin. A new technocratic wave in the West. Collection of articles. M., 1986 (In Russ.)
2. Kochergin A. N. Technosphere and society: the problem of interaction // Civil Aviation High Technologies. 2011. No. 166 P. 32—39 (In Russ.)
3. Zalasevich Jan. The unbearable burden of the technosphere // Courier UNESCO. No. 2. 2018. Electronic resource: http://www.intelros.ru/readroom/kurer-yunesko/u2-2018/35385-nevynosimoe-bremya-tehnosfery.html (In Russ.)
4. Timofeev-Resovsky N. V. Populations, biogeocenoses and the Earth’s biosphere / Collection of works of the conference “Mathematical Modeling in Biology”. M.: Science. 1975. P. 19—29 (In Russ.)
5. Pop kova N. V. The place of technology in the evolutionary picture of the world: philosophical concepts and prac tical conclusions // Age of globalization. 2018. No. 1 (25). P. 112— 123 (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30884/vglob/2018.01.11
6. Reimers N. F. Ecology (theories, laws, rules, principles and hypotheses). M.: Journal “Young Russia”. 1994. 367 p. (In Russ.)]
7. Dergacheva E. A. Specifics of global “technospherization” of biosphere in the modern epoch // Age of Globalization. 2014. No. 1 (13). P. 124—132 (In Russ.)
8. Leshkevich T. G. “Post-human” effects of technological development // State and municipal management. Scholar notes SKAGS. 2013. No. 3. P. 106— 113 (In Russ.)
9. Arshinov V. I., Gorokhov V. G. Social dimension of NBIC-interdisciplinary // Russian journal of philosophical sciences. 2010. No. 6. P. 22—35 (In Russ.)
10. Kutyrev V. A. Posthuman revolution as a result of technologisation of a human world // A science. Thought: electronic periodic journal. Vol. 7. 2017. No. 1—3. P. 45—49 (In Russ.)
11. Grachev V. A., Plyamina O. V. Global environmental problems, environmental safety and environmental efficiency of energy // Age of Globalization. 2017. No. 1 (21). P. 86—97 (In Russ.)]
12. Yudin B. Technoscience and human “enhancement” // Epistemology & philosophy of science. Vol. 48. 2016. No. 2. P. 18—27 (In Russ.)
13. Kourany J. Human Enhancement: Making the Debate More Productive // Erkenntnis 79 (S5):981-998 (2014). DOI: 10.1007/s10670-013-9539-z
14. Katsura A. V., Mazur I. I., Chumakov A. N. Planetary humanity: on the edge of the abyss. M.: Prospect. 2016. 208 p. (In Russ.)
15. Kutyryov V. A. Gone with progress: the eschatology of life in the technogenic world. St. Petersburg: Aleteia, 2016. 300 p. (Bodies of thought) (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Sokolov Yu.I. Risks of the Relationship between Man and Technology. Issues of Risk Analysis. 2021;18(1):16-31. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32686/1812-5220-2021-18-1-16-31
Views:
438
Email this article 