Comparative Nature Management Risk Assessment in the Russian Federation Districts
https://doi.org/10.32686/1812-5220-2020-17-5-48-71
Abstract
A method for assessing the risk of nature management and its mapping in the Russian Federation Districts: federal districts and constituent entities of the Siberian Federal District is proposed. The assessments were carried out for a comprehensive analysis of the Russian Federation Districts as a single administrative-territorial entity according to their own established factors of dangerous natural processes and the parameters of protection against natural disasters. A comparative analysis of the proposed methodology with existing approaches to assessing the risk of hazardous natural processes for the Russian Federation Districts is carried out. The risk of nature management equally depends on both the nature of the danger and the protection against natural disasters, in other words — both on the natural and socio-economic situation in the Russian Federation Districts. In many cases, the indicator of protection against natural disasters even plays a leading role, since its assessment includes current socio-economic characteristics that determine the real ability of management structures to predict and deal with the consequences of natural disasters, as well as psychological indicators, i.e. the will and sequence of actions of managers in making specific decisions on environmental management in a risky environment.
About the Author
S. V. KuzminRussian Federation
Sergey B. Kuzmin
664033, Russia, Irkutsk, Ulan-Batorskaya str., 1
References
1. Analysis, forecast and management of natural risks in the modern world / Ed. V.I. Osipov. M.: Publishing House of RUDN, 2015. 582 p. (Russia).
2. Burova V.N., Zaikanov V.G., Zaikanova I.N. et al. Approaches to assessing the vulnerability of objects of the economy and territories in case of emergencies of a natural character // Problems of reducing natural hazards and risks. Vol. 1 / Ed. N.G. Mavlyanova. M.: RUDN, 2012. P. 284—291 (Russia).
3. Burova V.N. The information and methodological basics for database evolution on the consequences of manifestations of natural hazards in the territory of the Russian Federation / V.N. Burova, E.A. Karfidova // Interactive science. 2017.№ 3 (13). P. 42—46. ISSN 2414-9411 (Russia). Doi:10.21661/r-118546.
4. National Atlas of Russia. Vol. 2. Nature and Ecology / Ed. A.V. Borodko and V.V. Sveshnikov. M.: Federal State Unitary Enterprise Gosgiscentre, 2004. 495 p. (Russia).
5. Osipov V.I., Burova V.N., Zaikanov V.G., Minakova T.B. Fundamentals of assessing territory vulnerability to hazardous natural processes determining emergencies (Principles and approaches) // Geoecology. 2015. No. 3. P. 195—203 (Russia).
6. Pashyan A.A. Ecological and economic zoning of Russia // Economics and innovations management. 2015. № 3 [Electronic journal (Russia). URL: http://ekonomika.snauka.ru/2015/03/7743
7. Salishchev K.A. Cartography. M.: Higher School, 1982. 272 p. (Russia).
8. Sokolov Yu.I. Risks of Manznature and Interaction // Issues of Risk Analysis. Vol. 14. 2017. No. 2. P. 6—21 (Russia). https://doi.org/10.32686/1812-5220-2017-14-2-6-21
9. Disaster risk management for man-made disasters and natural disasters / Ed. M.I. Faleev. M.: FSBI VNII GOCHS, 2016. 270 p. (Russia).
10. Faleev M.I. Integrated safety of the population and territories from emergency situations // Issues of Risk Analysis. Vol. 15. 2018. No. 1. P. 4—6 (Russia). https://doi.org/10.32686/1812-5220-2018-15-1-4-5
11. ФFaleev M.I., Malyshev V.P., Bykov A.A., Kondratiev-Firsov V.M. Methodological approaches to zoning the territories of the Russian Federation according to risk levels of emergency situations of natural and manmade character // Civil Protection Strategy. 2015. No. 1 (8). P. 67—90 (Russia).
12. Ferris E., Petz D. In the Neighborhood: The Growing Role of Regional Organizations in Disaster Risk Management. Washington: The Brookings Institution Press, 2013. 98 p.
13. Hollis S. The Role of Regional Organizations in Disaster Risk Management: A Strategy for Global Resilience. London: Palgrave MacMillan UK Press, 2015. 242 p.
14. Mohajan H.K. Sustainable Development Policy of Global Economy // American Journal of Environmental Protection. 2015. No 3. P. 12—29.
Review
For citations:
Kuzmin S.V. Comparative Nature Management Risk Assessment in the Russian Federation Districts. Issues of Risk Analysis. 2020;17(5):48-71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32686/1812-5220-2020-17-5-48-71