Organizational Culture in the Focus of Improving Risk Management in the Enterprise
https://doi.org/10.32686/1812-5220-2020-17-4-86-95
Abstract
The article considers the manifestations of the phenomenon of economic risk in the socioeconomic ecosystems of industrial enterprises, examines and differentiates the pragmatic and cultural aspects of the concept of "economic risk management". In terms of methodology, the study is based on the operational theory of risk management, and also uses tools to describe the organizational culture of risk management. Pragmatic and cultural differences in the characteristics of economic risk are identified at the level of stable forms of management activity with the involvement of the main provisions of the operational theory of risk management. The phenomenon of risk is considered in the ontological space as an artificial category of activity of industrial enterprises and other economic agents that form a socio-economic ecosystem. This phenomenon is studied as a specific form of social communication associated with the desire to assess the uncertain future in the present time, mainly from the point of view of analysis and management of the level of economic risk in the enterprise.
About the Authors
R. M. Kachalov
Central Economic and Mathematical Institute of the RAS
Russian Federation
Roman M. Kachalov
Russian Federation
Roman M. Kachalov
Yu. A. Sleptsova
Central Economic and Mathematical Institute of the RAS
Russian Federation
Yulia A. Sleptsova
Russian Federation
Yulia A. Sleptsova
References
1. Beck U. Risk society. On the way to another modern / Translate from German language. M.: Progress-Tradition. 2000. 384 p.
2. Kachalov R.M. Manage ment of economic risk: the theoretical foundations and applications. St. Petersburg, Nestor-Istoriya Publ. 2012. 288 p. (Russia).
3. Kachalov R. M., Sleptsova Y. A. Structuration of System and Economic Space of Enterprise and Risk Manage ment. Russian Management Journal. 2015. No. 13 (4). Р. 69—84 (Russia).
4. Kachalov R. M., Sleptsova Yu. A. Identifi cation of risk factors on the basis of decomposition economic area of enterprise. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University. 2016. No. 14 (396). Р. 86—94 (Russia).
5. Kleiner G.B. Industrial enterprise in unstable economics: risks, strategy, safety. M.: Economics, 1997. 286 c.
6. Adizes I., Cudanov M., Rodic D. Timing of Proactive Organizational Consulting: Difference between Organizational Perception and Behaviour, Amfiteatru Economic Journal. ISSN 2247-9104. Th e Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest. 2017. No. 19 (44). Р. 232—248.
7. Аven T. Th e risk concept–historical and recent development trends. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2012. No. 99. Р. 33—44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2011.11.006.
8. Aven T. Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation. European Journal of Operational Research. 2016. No. 253 (1). Р. 1—13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023
9. Balaman U., Sert O. Th e coordination of online L2 interaction and orientations to task interface for epistemic progression, Journal of Pragmatics. 2017. No. 115. Р. 115—129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.015
10. Burgess A., J. Wardman & G. Mythen. Considering Risk: Placing the Work of Ulrich Beck in Context. Journal of Risk Research. 2017. No. 21 (1). Р. 1—5. https://doi:10.1080/13669877.2017.1383075
11. Deppermann A. Inferential practices in social interaction: a conversation-analytic account. Open Linguistics. 2018. No. 4. Р. 35—55. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2018-0003
12. Hartl E., Hess T. The Role of Cultural Values for Digital Transformation: Insights from a Delphi Study. Twentythird Americas Conference on Information Systems, Boston. 2017.
13. Jacobs R., Abbott F., Urquhart L. & Price D. Performing the future: an artist-led project engaging with risk, uncertainty and environmental change. Journal of Risk Research. 2019. No. 22 (9). Р. 1171—1185. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2019.1569104
14. Kristjánsdóttir H., Guðlaugsson Þ. Ö., Guðmundsdóttir S. & Aðalsteinsson G. D. Hofstede national culture and international trade. Applied Economics. 2017. No. 49 (57). Р. 5792—5801. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1343446
15. La Brooy C., Pratt B. & Kelaher M. What is the role of con sensus statements in a risk society? Journal of Risk Research, 2019. Р 1—14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2019.1628094
16. Li M. Aumann and Serrano’s economic index of risk for sums of gambles. Cogent Economics & Finance. 2014. No. 2 (1), 921574. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2014.921574
17. Luhmann N. Technology, environment and social risk: a systems perspective. Industrial Crisis Quar terly. 1990. No. 4 (3). Р. 223—231. https://doi.org/10.1177/108602669000400305
18. Raymond C. W. & White A. E. C. Time Referen ce in the Service of Social Action. Social Psychology Quar terly. 2017. No. 80 (2). Р. 109—131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272516689468
19. Sabel C., Herrigel G. & Kristensen P. H. Regulation under uncertainty: The coevolution of industry and regulation. Regulation & Governance. 2018. No. 12 (3). Р. 371—394.
20. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12146
21. Seuren L. M. Assessing Answers: Action Ascription in Third Position. Research on Language and Social Interaction. 2018. No. 51 (1). Р. 33—51. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413890
22. Sidnell J. Action in interaction is conduct under a description. Language in Society. 2017. No. 46 (3). Р. 313—337. https://doi:10.1017/S0047404517000173
23. Villa V., Paltrinieri N., Khan F. & Cozzani V. Towards dynamic risk analysis: A review of the risk assessment approach and its limitations in the chemical process industry. Safety science. 2016. No. 89. Р. 77—93. https://doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2016.06.002
24. Zio E. The future of risk assessment. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2018. No. 177. P. 176—190. https://doi:10.1016/j.ress.2018.04.020
Review
For citations:
Kachalov R.M., Sleptsova Yu.A. Organizational Culture in the Focus of Improving Risk Management in the Enterprise. Issues of Risk Analysis. 2020;17(4):86-95. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32686/1812-5220-2020-17-4-86-95
Views:
547
Email this article 