Preview

Issues of Risk Analysis

Advanced search

Design Thinking as a Tool for the Analysis of Project Risks

https://doi.org/10.32686/1812-5220-2019-16-6-60-77

Abstract

This paper describes the method of project risk analysis based on design thinking and explores the possibility of its application for industrial investment projects. Traditional and suggested approaches to project risk management have been compared. Several risk analysis artifacts have been added to the standard list of artifacts. An iterative procedure for the formation of risk analysis artifacts has been developed, with the purpose of integrating the risk management process into strategic and prompt decision-making during project management. A list of tools at each stage of design thinking for risk management within the framework of real investment projects has been proposed. The suggested technology helps to determine project objectives and content and adapt them in regards to possible; as well as to implement measures aimed at reducing these risks, to increase productivity of the existing risk assessment and risk management tools, to organize effective cooperation between project team members, and to promote accumulation of knowledge about the project during its development and implementation.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

About the Authors

E. V. Vasilieva
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elena V. Vasilieva


T. V. Gaibova
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatyana V. Gaibova


References

1. Bykov A. A. About maximum permissible and preferred risk // Issues of Risk Analysis. Vol. 15. 2018. No. 6. P. 6—7 (Russia). https://doi.org/10.32686/1812- 5220-2018-15-6-7

2. Pinkovetskaia Yu.S. Evaluation of the industry level entrepreneurial risk in the Russian economy // Issues of Risk Analysis. Vol. 15. 2018. No. 6. P. 62—72 (Russia). https://doi.org/10.32686/1812-5220-2018-15-62-72

3. Fiyaksel E. A., Chaprak N. V. Assessment of investment activity’s efficiency on the basis of the analysis of the robustness of early-stage projects // Issues of Risk Analysis. Vol. 12. 2015. No. 3. P. 36—38 (Russia).

4. Ivanova L. A. Specifics of russian companies’ credit risk assessment and analysis: experts’ opinion // Issues of Risk Analysis. Vol. 12. 2015. No. 4. P. 64—75. (Russia).

5. Chernov V. G., Remezova E. G. Methods of uncertainty account in investment analysis // Finance and credit. Vol. 19. 2013. No. 15 (543). P. 12—24. (Russia).

6. Vyatkin V. N., Kazak A.Yu. An integrated approach to the assessment and classification of financial risks: formula and taxonomy of risks // Bulletin of Ural Federal University. Series Economics and Management. 2012. No 4. Р. 127—141. (Russia).

7. Kovalev P. P. Features of risk assessment of investment projects // Economics: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. Vol. 7. 2017. No. 5А. Р. 251—260. (Russia).

8. Shtele E. A., Guseva M. A., Rudi L. A. Assessment method of investment projects efficiency in view of the risks. The Russian Automobile and Highway Industry Journal. 2016; (6 (52)): 135—140. (Russia). https://doi. org/10.26518/2071-7296-2016-6(52)-135-140

9. Avdiysky V. I. Scientifictheoretical aspects of the riskoriented approach in the system of economic security // Issues of Risk Analysis. Vol. 14. 2017. No. 5. P. 20—29. (Russia). https://doi. org/10.32686/1812-5220-2017-14-5-20-29

10. Mukaev R. Kh. Risks assessment of investment projects of oil field development by the method of imitating modeling (Monte Carlo) // Issues of Risk Analysis. Vol. 12. 2015. No. 3. P. 22—35. (Russia).

11. Zubenko Y. D. System models for controlling the risks of enterprises // Issues of Risk Analysis. Vol. 14. 2017. No. 6. P. 72—82. (Russia). https:// doi.org/10.32686/1812-5220-2017-14-6-72-82

12. Gavel O. Yu. Analytical procedures in project risk management // Accounting. Analysis. Audit. 2015. No. 1. P. 28—33. (Russia).

13. Shumilina N. A. Information management system for solving the management tasks of projects of industrial enterprises risk-based on equipment failure // University proceedings. Volga region. Technical sciences. 2018. No. 2 (46). P. 48—63. (Russia). doi 10.21685/2072- 3059-2018-2-5

14. Gaibova T. V., Shumilina N. A. The formalization of the problem of project risk management of equipment failure // Scientific and Technical Volga region Bulletin. 2015. No. 2. P. 90—93. (Russia).

15. Owen C. Design thinking: Notes on its nature and use // Research Quarterly. 2007. No. 2 (1). Р. 16—27.

16. Vasilyeva E. V. Design thinking: a little about the approach and a lot about the tools for developing creative thinking, studying client requests and creating ideas: Monograph. Moscow: RUSAINS, 2018. 204 p. (Russia).

17. Dorst K. The core of “design thinking” and its application // Design Studies. Vol. 32. 2011. No. 6. Р. 521—532. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006

18. Dorst K., Cross N. Creativity in the design process: Coevolution of problem-solution // Design Studies. Vol. 22. 2001. No. 5. Р. 425–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142- 694X(01)00009-6

19. Gruber M., Leon N., George G., Thompson P. Managing by design // Academy of Management Journal. 2015. Vol. 58. No. 1. Р. 1—7. https://doi.org/10.1353/ail.2010.0021

20. Dijksterhuis E., Silvius G. The Design Thinking Approach to Projects // The Journal of Modern Project Management. Vol. 4. 2017. No. 3. Р. 1—15.

21. Turner R., Zolin R. Forecasting success on large projects: developing reliable scales to predict multiple perspectives by multiple stakeholders over multiple time frames // Project Management Journal. 2012. 43 (5). Р. 87—99. https:// doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21289

22. Strom L. C. L., Willumsen P. L., Oehmen J., Heck J. Can design thinking mitigate critical strategy implementation risks? // Proceedings of the Design. 15 th International Design Conference. 2018. Р. 1233—1244.

23. Atkinson R., Crawford L., Ward S. Fundamental uncertainties in projects and the scope of project management // International Journal of Project Management. Vol. 24 (8). 2006. Р. 687—698.

24. Deviations, Ambiguity and Uncertainty in a Project-Intensive Organization // Project Management Journal. Vol. 36. 2005. No. 3. P. 17—26.

25. Lenfle S. Exploration and project management // International Journal of Project Management. Vol. 26 (5). 2008. Р. 469—478.

26. Mahmoud-Jouini S., Midler Ch., Silberzahn Ph. Contributions of design thinking to project management in an innovation context // Project Management Journal. 2016. No. 47. Р. 144—156.

27. Gaibova T. V., Pavlovich T. V. Developing design alternatives based on ontological approach // Ontology of designing. 2019; 9 (3): 321—332. [(Russia). doi: 10.18287/2223-9537-2019-9-3- 321-332


Review

For citations:


Vasilieva E.V., Gaibova T.V. Design Thinking as a Tool for the Analysis of Project Risks. Issues of Risk Analysis. 2019;16(6):60-77. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32686/1812-5220-2019-16-6-60-77

Views: 1077


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1812-5220 (Print)
ISSN 2658-7882 (Online)