An interval assessment of the uncertainty of fire and emerging risk parameters
https://doi.org/10.32686/1812-5220-2018-15-74-79
Abstract
About the Author
E. Yu. KolesnikovRussian Federation
Yoshkar-Ola.
References
1. U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Reactor Safety Study — An Assessment of Accident Risk in Commercial Nuclear Power Plants. WASH-1400 (NUREG-75/014). Main report, 1975. 226 p.
2. Kolesnikov E. Yu. Quantitative estimation of the uncertainty of technogenic risk. Part 1 // Issue of risk analysis. 2013. Vol. 10. No 2. Р. 48—71.
3. Kolesnikov E. Yu. Quantitative estimation of the uncertainty of technogenic risk. Part 2 // Issue of risk analysis. 2013. Vol. 10. No 3. Р. 8—31.
4. JCGM 100:2008 GUM 1995 with minor corrections Evaluation of measurement data — Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. 134 р.
5. CPR-12E Methods for determining and processing probabilities (Red book). 3-nd ed. Hague: VROM, 2005. 604 p.
6. IAEA Safety series № 100. Evaluating the reliability of prediction made using environmental transfer models — IAEA, Vienna, 1989. 105 p.
7. Tikhonov M. N., Rylov M. I. After Chernobyl and Fukushima-1: identification and evaluation of the uncertainties and unlikely risks with catastrophic consequences // Issue of risk analysis. Vol. 11. 2014. Nо 2. Р. 24—49.
8. Kolesni kov E. Yu. Quantitative assessment of accident risk: uncertainty analysis // Occupational safety in industry. 2018. No 2. Р. 64—70.
9. Kolesnikov E. Yu., Telyakov E. Sh. Quantitative assessment of emergency risk: assessment of the parametric sensitivity of the models and the conservativeness of the accepted assumptions // Occupational safety in industry. 2018. No 3. Р. 63—67.
Review
For citations:
Kolesnikov E.Yu. An interval assessment of the uncertainty of fire and emerging risk parameters. Issues of Risk Analysis. 2018;15(6):74-79. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32686/1812-5220-2018-15-74-79