An universal approach to risk assessment of nature management in areas of natural disasters when planning and organizing of economic activities. Part 2

The article provides an example of the use of the ERA tool - environmental risk assessment and discusses the results of its use. As an example, the territory of the Irkutsk region was chosen, where hazardous natural processes (OPP) are widespread. They form factors of natural danger, i.e. its real manifestation in the form of a natural process, phenomenon or their combination, which can harm a specific human economic activity in nature (nature management), industry, enterprise or territory, reduce their efficiency and profitability. The interaction of man and nature establishes natural-anthropogenic connections that form a system of natural hazard factors or such a spatio-temporal combination of natural (ecological) and anthropogenic (anthropogenic) systems, in which their mutual functioning, beneficial for a certain community of people, is possible, but always associated with danger.

It was revealed that as a result of the development of the DGP, the safety of the population, economy and territories of the Irkutsk region is under threat today. Therefore, the developed models are of great importance for all stages of risk assessment and SS management. With their specific use, scientists must first understand the needs of the governing bodies, and then focus on identifying the problems associated with these needs. Development of a shared environmental risk management scheme on both sides, taking into account various points of view, are the basis for ensuring the safety of the population and economy of the Irkutsk region.

1. Agatova A. R. Large-scale geomorphological mapping of mountain regions (the Altai as an example) // Geomorfologiya. 2003;(2):48–60. (In Russ.)

2. Aizman R. I. Dangerous situations of a natural nature and protection against them. M.: Academy, 2014. 680 p. (In Russ.)

3. Barantsev R. G. Synergy in modern natural science. M.: URSS Editorial, 2003. 144 p. (In Russ.)

4. Barinov A. V., Sednev V. A., Shevchuk A. B. et al. Dangerous natural processes. M.: Academy of GPS EMERCOM of Russia, 2011. 334 p. (In Russ.)

5. Berdnikova L. F. Analysis of business risks in the system of economic security of the organization // Karelian Scientific Journal. 2017;6(2):47–50. (In Russ.)

6. Blank I. A. Financial Risk Management. M.: NIKA-CENTER, 2013. 214 p. (In Russ.)

7. Borodushko I. V., Maximov Yu. A. Economical risks in modern society: concept, types, assessment methods // Petersburg Economic Journal. 2017;(3):24–32. (In Russ.)

8. Valdman N. A. On the use of expert and statistics method in risk evaluation of marine works // Transport of the Russian Federation. 2011;(2):40–42. (In Russ.)

9. Vyrkin V. B. Classification of exogenous processes of land relief formation // Geografia i Prirodnye Resursy. 1986;(4):20–24. (In Russ.)

10. Gayvoronskiy S. A., Ezangina T. A., Khozhaev I. V., Nesenchuk A. A. Analyzing robust stability of an interval control system on the basis of vertex polynomials // Мechatronics, Automation, Control. 2019;20(5):266–273. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17587/mau.20.266-273

11. Glad’ko A.V., Gubajdullin M. G. Techniques of the assessment of ecological risk at gas-and oil field development in shelf zone of Pechora sea // Regional Environmental Issues. 2008;(8):196–201. (In Russ.)

12. Gorelov S. K., Grave M. K., Kozlova A. E. Map of modern geomorphological processes of the USSR // Geomorfologiya. 1990;(1):4–14. (In Russ.)

13. Dorofeyuk A. A., Pokrovskaya I. V., Chernyavkii A. L. Expert methods to analyze and perfect management systems // Automation and Remote Control. 2004;65(10):1675–1688

14. Elokhin A. N., Zaikin I. A., Fedkushov I. Yu. et al. Application of expert assessment methods for risk calculation // Problems of security management of complex systems. Ed. N. I. Arkhipova. T.1. M.: IRIS, 2002. P. 128–136. (In Russ.)

15. Ivanov V. M. Dangerous situations of a natural nature and protection against them: textbook / Stavropol: Publishing House of the North Caucasus Federal University, 2016. 170 p. (In Russ.)

16. Ivanovsky L. N. Issues of development of leading exogenous processes of relief formation // Geography and Natural Resources. 1998;(1):23– 30. (In Russ.)

17. Ivanovsky L. N. Structure of leading exogenous processes at the regional level // Geography and Natural Resources. 1989;(4):14–22. (In Russ.)

18. Ivanovsky L. N. Leading exogenous processes and geomorphological risk in the mountains of Southern Siberia // Geography and Natural Resources. 1994;(2):5–10. (In Russ.)

19. Knaub P. V., Ignateva A. V. Influence of the natural adverse phenomena on sustainable development of mountain territories (on the example of regions of Siberian federal district) // Sustainable Development of Mountain Territories. 2019;11(4):436–448. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21177/1998-4502-2019-11-4-436-448

20. Knyazeva E. N., Kurdyumov S. P. Grounds of synergetics. Synergistic worldview / M.: Librocom, 2014. 264 p. ISBN 978-5-397-04517-9. (In Russ.)

21. Korobov V. B., Kochurov B. I. Ball classifications in geoecology: advantages and disadvantages // Regional Environmental Issues. 2007;(1):66–70. (In Russ.)

22. Koronovsky N. V., Bryantseva G. V. Dangerous natural processes: textbook / M.: INFRA-M, 2019. 233 p. (In Russ.)

23. Kuzmin S. B. The structure of hazardous morphogenetic processes in the Irkutsk region // Geomorfologiya. 2004;(4):32–47. (In Russ.)

24. Kuzmin S. B. Classification of hazardous morphogenetic processes of the Irkutsk region // Proceedings of the Russian Geographical Society. 2006;138(3):64–70. (In Russ.)

25. Kuzmin S. B. Natural hazards of Irkutsk region // GeoRisk World. 2016;(4):52–67. (In Russ.)

26. Kuzmin S. B. Geoecological areas of the Irkutsk region with the hazardous geomorphological processes as complex geomorphosystems for nature use risk assessment // Slozhnye Sistemy. 2018;(2):30–57. (In Russ.)

27. Mazur I. I., Ivanov O. P. Dangerous natural processes: textbook / M.: Economics, 2004. 702 c. (In Russ.)

28. Nevsky V. N. New approaches to development of basic geomorphological classifications (with reference to mountains of the south far east of Russia) // Geomorfologiya. 2003;(1):40–48. (In Russ.)

29. Nerovnykh A. N., Zavorotny A. G., Butenko V. M. et al. Dangerous natural processes / M.: Academy of GPS EMERCOM of Russia, 2015. 306 p. (In Russ.)

30. Nesenchuk A. A. Algorithm for synthesis of the stable characteristic polynomials for dynamic systems under parametric variations // Informatics. 2019;16(4):51–62. (In Russ.)

31. Perminova M. Y. The analysis of partitions based algorithm of polynomials decomposition // Cybernetics and programming. 2015;(6):21–34. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.7256/2306-4196.2015.6.17169

32. Prigozhin I., Stengers I. Order from chaos. M.: Progress, 1986. 432 p.

33. Raskatova M. I. Management decision making on the basis of joint application of risk management and the balanced scorecard // Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Economics and Management. 2019;13(1):154–161. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.14529/em190116

34. Saati T. Decision-making. Hierarchy analysis method. M.: Radio and communication, 1993. 320 p.

35. Solntsev V. N. Geological and geomorphological framework in the formation of the physical and geographical structure of the territory // Bulletin of Moscow State University. Geographical series. 1974;(1):53–62. (In Russ.)

36. Timofeyev D. A. Principles of geomorphic processes classification // Geomorfologiya. 2004;(4):16–20. (In Russ.)

37. Florensov N. A. Essays on structural geomorphology. M.: Science, 1978. 238 p. (In Russ.)

38. Haken G. Synergetics / Translation from the English V. I. Emelyanova; Ed.; (and with foreword. Yu. L. Klimontovich, S. M. Osovets. M.: Mir, 1980. 404 p.

39. Chaiko A. V., Mistryukov A. A. Classification of exogenous processes and the problem of their mapping // Geomorfologiya. 1992;(1):25–30. (In Russ.)

40. Shalaev V. P. Synergy of man, society, nature: managerial aspect / V. P. Shalaev. Yoshkar-Ola: Periodicals of Mari El, 2000. 134 p. ISBN 5-8158-0086-4. (In Russ.)

41. Yatsenko R. I. Identification of morpholithosystems for ecological-landscape zoning // Geomorphology. 2001;(4):17–25. (In Russ.)

42. Berz G., Kron W., Loster T. R. et al. World map of natural hazards: a global view of the distribution and intensity of significant exposures // Natural Hazards. 2001;23(2–3): 443–465.

43. Bettin G., Zazzaro A. The impact of natural disasters on remittances to low- and middle-income countries // Journal of Development Studies. 2018;54(3):481–500. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2798145

44. Cavallo E., Galiani S., Noy I., Pantano J. Catastrophic natural disasters and economic growth // Reviews of Economic Statistics. 2013:95(5):1549–1561. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1597507

45. Dilley M., Chen R. S., Deichmann U. et al. Natural Disaster Hotspots: A Global Risk Analysis. Washington, DC: World Bank Press, 2005. 148 p.

46. Halkos G., Zisiadou A. Examining the natural environmental hazards over the last century // Economics of Disasters and Climate Change. 2019;(3):119–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41885-018-0037-2

47. Scheip C.M., Wegmann K. W. HazMapper: a global open-source natural hazard mapping application in Google Earth Engine // Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences. 2021;(21):1495–1511. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-1495-2021.

48. Steinberg T. Acts of God: The Unnatural History of Natural Disaster in America. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006. 336 p.

49. Kuzmin S. B. An universal approach to risk assessment of nature management in areas of natural disasters when planning and organizing of economic activities. Part 1 // Issues of Risk Analysis. 2025;22(2): 78–91. (In Russ.). — EDN: AZQVYV