Buy (150 RUB)
|Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription or Fee Access
Analysis of the Processes of Creating IT-Products as Part of the Implementation of IT-Projects
EDN: DQSXBS
Abstract
В статье представлены результаты анализа международных сводов знаний управления проектами (PMBOK Guide®, ISO и др.) и национальных стандартов (ГОСТ Р ИСО/МЭК 12207, серия стандартов ИСО/МЭК 15504, ГОСТ Р ИСО 21500, семейство стандартов «Проектный менеджмент»), регламентирующих формализацию процессов создания ИТ-продуктов и процессов управления проектами, в том числе в области ИТ. Выбор этой области исследования обусловлен низкой долей успешно завершенных ИТ-проектов, а также значительным материальным ущербом, который получают ИТ-субъекты в результате неисполнения существенных условий контрактов.
Цель статьи: проведение анализа процессов, реализуемых во время фаз жизненного цикла ИТ-проекта, процессов, распределенных по предметным группам, и процессов контроллинга ИТ-проекта.
Итогом проведенного анализа стала разработанная процессная модель создания ИТ-продуктов в рамках выполнения ИТ-проектов, включающая в себя 62 подпроцесса. В статье представлены доказательства того, что разработанная процессная модель элиминирует наступление рисков и негативных последствий, связанных с отклонением от базовых планов и существенных условий контрактов.
About the Author
V. S. Nikolaenko
Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics; Tomsk Polytechnic University; Siberian State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Valentin S. Nikolaenko
634050; Lenin Ave., 40; Lenin Ave., 30; Moscow Tract, 2; Tomsk
References
1. Nikolaenko V. S. Negative and positive risks in IT-projects // Moscow University Bulletin. Series 21. Public Administration. 2018;(3):91–124. (In Russ.)
2. Nikolaenko, Valentin, and Anatoly Sidorov. 2023. Analysis of 105 IT project Risks. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 16: 33. doi: 10.3390/jrfm16010033
3. Filippov A., Romanov A., Skalkin A., Stroeva J., Yarushkina N. Approach to formalizing software projects for solving design automation and project management tasks // Software. 2023;2(1):133–162. doi: 10.3390/software2010006
4. Vishnyakov O. The advantage of repeatability: a practical guide to business processes: processes and their description / O. Vishnyakov. St. Petersburg Moscow Minsk: Peter, 2022. 302 с. ISBN 978-5-4461-1991-2. (In Russ.)
5. Shestopal Yu.T., Dorofeev N. Yu., Shestopal N. Yu., Andreeva E. A. Quality management : training manual, M.: INFRA-M. 2019. 331 p. (In Russ.)
6. Kuhail M. A., Lauesen S. User Story Quality in Practice: A Case Study // Software. 2022;1(3):223-243. doi: 10.3390/software1030010
7. Mazur K., Saleh M., Hornung M. Integrating Life Cycle Assessment in Conceptual Aircraft Design: A Comparative Tool Analysis // Aerospace. 2024;11(1):101. doi: 10.3390/aerospace11010101
8. Truong B. Q., Nguyen- Duc A., Van N. T. C. A Quantitative review of the research on business process management in digital transformation: a bibliometric approach // Software. 2023;2(3):377-399. doi: 10.3390/software2030018
9. Zhao Z., Zhang L., Lian X., Gao X., Lv H., Shi L. Req Gen: Keywords-driven software requirements generation // Mathematics. 2023;11(2):332. doi: 10.3390/math11020332
10. Kiemel S., Rietdorf C., Schutzbach M., Miehe R. How to Simplify Life Cycle Assessment for Industrial Applications — A Comprehensive Review // Sustainability. 2022;14(23): 15704. doi: 10.3390/su142315704
11. Gładysz B., Kuchta D. Sustainable metrics in project financial risk management // Sustainability. 2022;14 (21):14247. doi: 10.3390/su142114247
12. O’Neill D. The way forward: A strategy for harmonizing agile and CMMI // CrossTalk. 2016;29(4):4–9
13. Alasmari E., Martinez- Vazquez P., Baniotopoulos C. A Systematic literature review of the adoption of building information modelling (bim) on life cycle cost (LCC) // Buildings. 2022;12(11):1829. doi: 10.3390/buildings12111829
14. Gonzalez-Granadillo G., Menesidou S. A., Papamartzivanos D., Romeu R., Navarro- Llobet D., Okoh C., Nifakos S., Xenakis C., Panaousis E. Automated Cyber and Privacy Risk Management Toolkit // Sensors. 2021;21(16):5493. doi: 10.3390/s21165493
15. Dulzon A. A. Project management : educational and methodological manual for universities / A. A. Dulzon; Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation, National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University. — Tomsk: Publishing House of Tomsk Polytechnic University, 2013. 111 p., ISBN 978-5-4387-0203–0 (In Russ.)
16. Barahmand Z., Eikeland M. S. Life cycle assessment under uncertainty : a scoping review // World. 2022;3(3):692–717. doi: 10.3390/world3030039
17. Balaji S., Sundararajan Murugaiyan M. Waterfall Vs V–Model Vs Agile: a comparative on SDLC // International Journal of Information Technology and Business Management. 2012: 2(1):26–30.
18. Biable S. E., Garcia N. M., Midekso D., Pombo N. Ethical issues in software requirements engineering // Software. 2022;1(1):31–52. doi: 10.3390/software1010003
19. Combéfis S. Automated code assessment for education : review, classification and perspectives on techniques and tools // Software. 2022;1(1):3–30. doi: 10.3390/software1010002
20. Agh H., Ramsin R. A Model-driven approach for software process line engineering // Software. 2023;2(1):21–70. doi: 10.3390/software2010003
21. Sahu R., Choudhari B. R., Yadav S. Usages of six sigma in library services // Conference: Library as a Medium of Communication. 2022. P. 1–4
22. Kim I., Kim S., Kim H., Shin D. Mission- based cybersecurity test and evaluation of weapon systems in association with risk management framework // Symmetry. 2022;14(11):2361. doi: 10.3390/sym14112361
23. Hu K., Zhu J., Ding Y., Bai X., Huang J. Smart contract engineering // Electronics. 2020;9(12):2042. doi: 10.3390/electronics9122042
24. Polubelova M. V., Pyankova K. A. Controlling: definition, goals and tasks // Accounting, Analysis and Audit: Problems of Theory and Practice. 2018;(21):133–137. (In Russ.)
25. Prosvirova E. V. Controlling as an effective cost management system // Economy and Business: Theory and Practice. 2018;(11–2):58–60. (In Russ.) doi: 10.24411/2411-0450-2018-10151
26. Demina I. D. Formation of the concept of controlling as a scientific and educational discipline // Innovative development of the economy. 2017;(1):151–156. (In Russ.)
27. Wakimoto M., Morisaki S. A Metric for questions and discussions identifying concerns in software reviews // Software. 2022;1(3):364–380. doi: 10.3390/software1030016
28. Menezes T. A. Review to find elicitation methods for business process automation software // Software. 2023;2(2):177–196. doi: 10.3390/software2020008
29. Huss M., Herber D. R., Borky J. M. Comparing measured agile software development metrics using an agile model-based software engineering approach versus scrum only // Software. 2023;2(3):310–331. doi: 10.3390/software2030015
30. Guerrero-Ulloa G., Rodríguez-Domínguez C., Hornos M. J. Agile methodologies applied to the development of internet of things (IoT)-Based systems : a review // Sensors. 2023;23(2):790. doi: 10.3390/s23020790
Review
For citations:
Nikolaenko V.S. Analysis of the Processes of Creating IT-Products as Part of the Implementation of IT-Projects. Issues of Risk Analysis. 2025;22(1):68-87. (In Russ.) EDN: DQSXBS
Views:
166
Email this article 