Buy (150 RUB)
Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription or Fee Access
Chemical Processes Safety Risks Control and Management
Abstract
The established practices of safety and risks control and management at designed and operating chemical processes are reviewed within the framework of the general theory for complex systems control and management in a historical retrospective. The prediction (image of the end result) of the 3rd generation is revealed by using conceptual apparatus in the field of safety for engineering and operating that was presented in [1]. The developed theory solves a significant practical issue — the rational (in a format of standardized work) processes, and roles and responsibilities; minimum necessary requirements for tools and key performance indicators are justified to control / manage process safety risks at each production level — operative (shift supervisor), tactical (unit superintendent) and strategic (director, business manager) are presented. The obtained results show that (only) third generation systems for controlling and managing process safety risks are able to implement in practice within a reasonable time frame the accomplishment of ZERO safety objective. Thus, setting the production objective “no hurt to people, no harm to the environment and no damage to business” makes sense in chemical industry due to the fact that accomplishing of such an objective is feasible and reasonably practicable.
About the Author
A. N. Chernoplekov
Russian Risk Management Society
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexei N. Chernoplekov
Nikulinskaya St., 27-129, Moscow, 119602
References
1. Chernoplekov A. N. Safety and risks of chemical processes // Issues of Risk Analysis. 2024;21(5):10–35. (In Russ.)
2. CCPS Guidelines for Risk Based Process Safety NY.; AIChE, 2007 John Wiley & Sons pp. 857. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470925119
3. Marshall V. K. The main dangers of chemical production // translation from English: Production Safety Issues of Risk Analysis, Vol. 21, 2024, No. 6 G. Barsamyan, A. Dvoinishnikov, M. Makstenek. M.: Mir, 1989. 671 p. ISBN 5-03-000990-6
4. Beschastnov M. V. Industrial explosions. Assessment and warning // M. Chemistry, 1991. 432 p. (In Russ.)
5. Radionova S.G., Makhutov N.A., Chernoplekov A.N., Karaev A.E. Improvement of regulatory regulation of industrial safety, taking into account the need to stimulate innovative activities of enterprises // Federal Directory, No. 26, August 2012, pp. 291-306 (in Russ.)
6. Lawley H. G. Operability Studies and Hazard Analysis // Chemical Engineering Progress, 1974, April, Vol. 70, No 4, pp. 45–56
7. Rasmussen, Professor Norman C.; et al. (October 1975). “Reactor safety study. An assessment of accident risks in U. S. commercial nuclear power plants. Executive Summary”. Wash-1400 (Nureg-75/014). Rockville, MD, USA: Federal Government of the United States, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
8. The Public Inquiry into the Piper Alpha Disaster. The Hon Lord Cullen. Volume One. // London: HMSO, 1990-1-254 pp.
9. The Public Inquiry into the Piper Alpha Disaster. The Hon Lord Cullen. Volume Two. // London: HMSO, 1990-255-488 pp.
10. Lord Cullen of Whitekirk. Piper Alpha Perspectives. // The Chemical Engineer, 2018 July /August 2018 (Issue 925/926)
11. Dronyaev O. I., Martynyuk V. Ph. On the application of the method “Hazard and operability studies” in the analysis of the risk of accidents at production facilities // Bezopasnost’ Zhiznedeyatel’nosti. 2023;(11):41–47 (In Russ.)
12. Dronyaev O. I., Martynyuk V. Ph. Preparation and organization of the sessions preparation and organization of meetings when using the method “Hazard and operability studies” for the analysis of the risk of accidents at production facilities // Bezopasnost’ Zhiznedeyatel’nosti. 2024;(10):48–56. (In Russ.)
13. Krasnoshchekov P. S. Modeling Principles / P.S. Krasnoshchekov, A. A. Petrov. M.: Publishing House of Moscow State University, 1983–264 p. (In Russ.)
14. Samarsky A. A. Mathematical modeling: Ideas. Methods. Examples / A.A. Samarsky, A. P. Mikhailov M.: Science. Fizmatlit, 1997. 320 p. (In Russ.)
15. Body of knowledge on business process management BPM CBOK 3.0: transl. from Engl. / [scientific editors Belaychuk A. A., Eliferov V. G.] M.:, APUBP, 2015. 432 p. ISBN 978-5-9906716-0-7 (In Russ.)
16. Organization management link: what these are and what types exist // Director General. 2019. № 5. URl: https://www.gd.ru/articles/10288-zveno-upravleniya-eto (In Russ.)
17. Sklet, Snorre. (2006). Safety barriers: Definition, classification, and performance. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 19. 494–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2005.12.004
18. Zhukov I. S. Safety Barriers: Notion, Classification, Concepts // Occupational Safety in Industry. 2017;(5):49–56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24000/0409-2961-2017-5-49-56
19. Gastev A. K. How to work: a practical introduction to the science of labor organization / A. K. Gastev; under the general. ed. N. M. Bahrakh [et al.]. Ed. 3rd. M.: Librocom, 2011. 477 p. ISBN 978-5-397-01984-2. (In Russ.)]
20. Konnov D. V. I am trying to wean employees from the word agile / Harvard Business Review — Russia, “2019, October 1 (interview) / URL: https://plastinfo.ru/information/articles/700/ (In Russ.)
21. Galileo G. Selected works in two volumes. T.1 / Compiled by U. I. Frankfurt. M.: Science / 1964. P. 242]
22. Brennan Kevin (2009). A Guide to the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge (BABOK Guide) / International Institute of Business Analysis. 271 p. ISBN 978-0-9811292-1-1
23. Bykov A. A. Methodological and applied foundations of enterprise risk management and public and environmental safety: monogr. / A. A. Bykov, V. E. Zaikovsky; under general. ed. Corr. Member of RAS N. A. Makhutov. Publishing House Tomsk. State University of Control Systems and Electronics, 2022. 617 p. ISBN 978-5-86889-954-6. (In Russ.)]
Review
For citations:
Chernoplekov A.N. Chemical Processes Safety Risks Control and Management. Issues of Risk Analysis. 2024;21(6):10-39. (In Russ.)
Views:
161
Email this article 