Modern Concept of Risk-Based Management of Regulated Procurement
Abstract
The article is devoted to the current problem of risk-based management of regulated procurement, due to the high importance of state, municipal procurement and procurement of stateowned companies in the national economy. The purpose of the study is to summarize the author’s previous works, which have consistently, since 2016, studied various aspects of risk management: general approaches, methodologies and models, features of identifying and accounting for implicit risks in the field of state and municipal procurement, the impact of digitalization on management decision-making in uncertainty.
Thanks to the systematic work carried out, the author substantiates the modern concept of riskoriented management of regulated procurement, based on such principles as: dynamism, customer focus, integration into the company’s procurement management system, functioning within the framework of the platform economy.
The research methodology is based on a combination of methods of analysis, synthesis, expert assessments and management decision-making.
Unlike other studies on similar topics, the novelty of the concept proposed by the author lies in the accounting and mapping of procurement risks not so much from the point of view of compliance with budget legislation, but from the point of view of the quality of management decisionmaking by procurement specialists.
Theoretical results are associated with the development of the theory of state regulation of the economy, the management of state and municipal purchases. The practical value of the work is associated with the development of a new type of risk maps for the implementation of modern risk-based management of regulated procurement.
About the Author
Dzh. А. Sozaeva
Moscow University for Industry and Finance “Synergy”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dzhamiliya A. Sozaeva
Leningradsky avenue, 80, Moscow, 125315
References
1. Zhang Q, Cremer JL, Grossmann IE, Sundaramoorthy A, Pinto JM. Risk-based integrated production scheduling and electricity procurement for continuous powerintensive processes. Computers and Chemical Engineering. 2016 Mar 4;86:90–105. doi: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2015.12.015
2. Don Samuel Risk-based tender evaluation using multicriteria decision analysis in Trinidad and Tobago. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers — Management, Procurement and Law 171(2):58–69, https://doi.org/10.1680/jmapl.17.00047
3. Karanina E., Kartavyh K. Risk-based assessment model of the state and municipal procurement system // International Science Conference SPbWOSCE-2018 “Business Technologies for Sustainable Urban Development” St. Petersburg, Russia, December 10–12. 2018
4. Martínez Raya A, González-Sánchez VM. Tender Management Relating to Imposition of Public Service Obligations on Scheduled Air Routes: An Approach Involving Digital Transformation of Procurement Procedures in Spain. Sustainability. 2020; 12(13):5322. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135322
5. Duraku, A. (2019) “Public Expenditures Through Public Procurement”, European Journal of Engineering and Formal Sciences, 2(1), pp. 50–64. doi: 10.26417/ejef.v2i2.p40–49
6. Walker, Helen & Brammer, Stephen. (2012). The relationship between sustainable procurement and e-procurement in the public sector. International Journal of Production Economics. 140. 256–268. 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.008
7. Somasundaram R, Damsgaard J. Policy Recommendations for Electronic Public Procurement. Electronic Journal of e-Government. 2005;3(3):147–156.
8. Kosmol T., Reimann F., Kaufmann L. You’ll never walk alone: Why we need a supply chain practice view on digital procurement. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management. 2019;25(4):100553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2019.100553
9. Bienhaus F., Haddud A. Procurement 4.0: factors influencing the digitisation of procurement and supply chains // Business Process Management Journal. 2018. Vol. 24. No. 4. P. 965–984. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-06-2017-0139;
10. Tsygankov S. S. Digitalization of the modern public procurement system in Russia // Economics: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow. 2020;10(12А):183–198. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.34670/AR.2020.11.74.068
11. Bizhoev B. M. Digital institutional transformation of electronic trading platforms in the field of public procurement of the Russian Federation // MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research). 2021;12(4):416–433. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2021.12.4.416-433
12. Sozaeva D. A. Risk management: approaches, models, methodologies // Issues of Risk Analysis. 2016;13(4):6–20. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.32686/1812-5220-2016-13-4-6-20
13. Bezdenezhnykh V. M., Rodionov A. S. Proactive riskoriented approach in scenario planning of company activities // Economics, taxes & law. 2017;10(6):76–83 (In Russ.)
14. Telenkov E. E. Four steps to building a riskoriented model of management of the company // ETAP: Economic Theory, Analysis, and Practice. 2017;(3):139– 153. (In Russ.)
15. Eremina A. V., Maksimov A. G. Network effects and their influence on contract prices at oil-product market // System modeling of socio-economic processes: abstracts to the reports of the 41st International Scientific School-Seminar named after Academician S. S. Shatalin, Nizhny Novgorod, September 30–October 04, 2018 / Ed. by V. G. Grebennikov, I. N. Shchepina. Nizhny Novgorod: Istoki (Voronezh), 2018. P. 84. (In Russ.)
16. Shastitko A. E., Parshina E. N. Twosided markets: the subject matter specification // Joirnal of Modern Competition, 2016;10(1):5–18. (In Russ.)
17. Styrin E. M., Rodionova, Y.D. Unified Information System in Public Procurement as a Government Digital Platform: The Present State and Prospects // Public Administration Issues, 2020;(3):49–70 (In Russ.)
18. Denisova A. I., Sozaeva D. A., Gonchar K. V., Aleksandrov G. A. Improving the methodology for assessing the economic efficiency of public procurement of medicines // Financial Journal. 2023;15(4):63–81. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31107/2075-1990-2023-4-63-81
19. Degtyareva V. V., Sozaeva D. A. Cognitive features of managerial decision making in terms of the digital economy the results of experiment // Vestnik Universiteta. 2019;(4): 5–13. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2019-4-5-13
20. Sozaeva D. A. Implicit risks in the system of state and municipal procurement and the methodology for identifying them // Management Theory and Practice Problems. 2021; (6):250–262. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.46486/0234-4505-2021-6-250-262.
Review
For citations:
Sozaeva D.А. Modern Concept of Risk-Based Management of Regulated Procurement. Issues of Risk Analysis. 2023;20(6):58-68. (In Russ.)
Views:
185
Email this article 