Possible Directions to Increase the Sustainability of Organizations Necessary for the Survival of the Population in Modern Military Conflicts
https://doi.org/10.32686/1812-5220-2023-20-5-60-70
Abstract
The aim of the research is to evaluate various ways to counter precision weapons to improve the resilience of organizations needed for population survival in modern military conflicts. Research objectives: assessing the characteristics of high-precision weapons used in modern military conflicts, analyzing the possibility of using various methods of countering high-precision weapons to increase the stability of organizations necessary for population survival. Possible directions of using these methods are proposed, based on both active and passive counteraction to high-precision weapons. The materials of the article were prepared on the basis of studying open sources
About the Authors
V. P. Malyshev
Federal State Budgetary Establishment “All-Russian
Scientific Research Institute for Civil Defenсe and Emergencies
of the EMERCOM of Russia” (Federal Science and High
Technology Center)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladlen P. Malyshev
Davydkovskaya str., 7, Moscow, 121352
O. V. Vinogradov
Federal State Budgetary Establishment “All-Russian
Scientific Research Institute for Civil Defenсe and Emergencies
of the EMERCOM of Russia” (Federal Science and High
Technology Center)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Oleg V. Vinogradov
Davydkovskaya str., 7, Moscow, 121352
References
1. Tulin S.N. US Armed Forces: Scenarios of Global Strikes by Non-Nuclear Means // Foreign Military Review. 2010;(3):3–10. (In Russ.)
2. Borisov E.G., Evdokimov V.I. Highprecision weapons and the fight against them: Textbook. St. Petersburg: Publishing house “Lan” 2018. 496 p. (In Russ.)
3. Sivkov K.V. US Rocket Sword // Military Industrial Courier. 2018. № 29 (497). P. 10–11. (In Russ.)
4. Litovchenko V.V. Essence of categories of war and special military operations // Army collection. 2022. № 7. (In Russ.)
5. Shevtsov L.V., Bartosh A.A. Questions of the theory of hybrid war / M.: Academy of Military Sciences. 2022. (In Russ.)
6. Ludwig V.A. Passive counteraction to precision weapon guidance systems. M.: LENAND, 2016. 224 p. (In Russ.)
7. Hampe E. Civil Defense Strategy. M.: Foreign literature. 1958. 131 p.
8. Silnikov M.V. Technical systems for protecting facilities / Collection of reports of the conference Technological terrorism and methods for preventing terrorist threats. M.: Combitel, 2020. P. 202–211. (In Russ.)
9. SNiP 2.01.53-84. Light camouflage of settlements and objects of the national economy. (In Russ.)
10. Grishkevich A.A., Kulyapin V.P., et al. Principles of the use of modern means and methods of comprehensive masking of critical objects // Materials of the XIV NPK “Current protection and security problems” Vol. 3. St. Petersburg: RARAN, NGO of Special Materials. 2011. (In Russ.)
11. Didenko S.L., Sosunov I.V., Malyshev V.P. Methodological Foundations for Ensuring the Protection of Critical and Potentially Dangerous Facilities / EMERCOM of Russia. M.: FSBI VNII GOChS (FC) EMERCOM of Russia, 2019. 290 p. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Malyshev V.P., Vinogradov O.V. Possible Directions to Increase the Sustainability of Organizations Necessary for the Survival of the Population in Modern Military Conflicts. Issues of Risk Analysis. 2023;20(5):60-70. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32686/1812-5220-2023-20-5-60-70
Views:
258
Email this article 