Preview

Issues of Risk Analysis

Advanced search

Risk analysis of management of water systems in the Russian Federation

https://doi.org/10.32686/1812-5220-2022-19-6-86-98

Abstract

The management of the water management complex is based on the analysis of a large number of processes developing in systems that are techno-natural  in nature, on the one hand, and in complex socio-economic systems affecting the whole society as a whole, on the other. The management methods implemented in practice today are based mainly on the analysis of the functioning of individual parts (individual processes) of the system, ideas about the processes under consideration are often not consistent, especially when it comes to technical and social systems. Regulatory management  methods,  including  technical  regulation,  are  considered separately. Socio-economic processes at different levels of temporal and spatial organization are investigated and predicted independently. At the same time, of course, regulatory legal knowledge is taken into account, but resource restrictions may fall out or be ignored, society is immune to instructions and recommendations lowered from above, legal nihilism takes place, the problem of qualification of decision-makers arises, etc.

Certain possibilities for analyzing such situations are provided by risk theory methods. The purpose of the article is to analyze the risks arising at various stages of justifying water management measures, from design to strategies for the development of the industry as a whole. In particular, traditional methods of engineering calculations are considered, which ensure a given level of reliability of the designed water construction facilities in relation to hazardous impacts (loads), which are based on the concept of design probabilities. This approach provides a normative level of reliability, but does not guarantee the economic optimality of decisions made, is insufficient to  implement  the  social functions  of measures  and  structures,  and  is difficult to  analyze environmental problems. Obtaining quantitative estimates of the parameters of structures and measures, carried out on the basis of probabilistic approaches, should be based at least on taking into account the possible consequences of decisions taken, as well as on damage assessments expressed in the form of relevant risks.

About the Author

M. V. Bolgov
Water Problems Institute Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Mikhail V. Bolgov.

Gubkina str., 3, Moscow, 119333



References

1. GOST R 54257-2010 of the Russian Federation “Reliability of Building Structures and Foundations”. Approved and put into effect by Order of the Federal Agency for Technical Regulation and Metrology dated December 23, 2010 No. 1059-st 4 (currently canceled), (In Russ.)

2. Federal Law “Technical Regulations on Safety of Buildings and Structures”. Adopted by the State Duma on December 23, 2009, approved by the Federation Council on December 25, 2009, (In Russ.)

3. SP 58.13330.2012 Code of Practice «Hydraulic Structures. Main provisions of». Updated edition of SNiP 33-01-2003. Date of introduction 2013-01-01, (In Russ.)

4. SP 33-101-2003 Determination of basic hydrological characteristics (instead of SNiP 2.01.14-83), Moscow. Gosstroy of the Russian Federation. 2004, (In Russ.)

5. STO 70238424. 27. 140. 026-2009. Hydroelectric power plants. Assessment and forecasting of risks of accidents of hydraulic structures. Regulations and requirements. INVEL organization standard. Moscow, 2009. 50 p., (In Russ.)

6. Begam L. G., Tsypin V. S. Reliability of bridge crossings. M., ed. Transport. 1984. 254 p., (In Russ.)

7. Bolgov M. V., Korobkina E. A., Filippova I. A., Osipova N. V. Distribution function of maximum discharge: accounting for probable maximum flood // Gidrotehniceskoe Stroitel'stvo. 2019;(1):23-28, (In Russ.)

8. Asarin A. Y., Zhirkevich A. N. On the necessity of development of the probable maximal flood (pmf) computation method for engineering/hydrological calculations in Russian // Water Sector of Russia: Problems, Technologies, Management. 2012;(4):53-63, (In Russ.)

9. Bolgov M. V., Pisarenko V. F. The distribution of peak runoff values in maritime territory rivers // Vodnye Resursy. 1999;26(6):710-721, (In Russ.)

10. Bolgov M. V., Sarmanov I. O. Truncated three-parameter gamma distribution of S. N. Kritsky and M. F. Menkel and some of its applications to hydrological calculation // Vodnye Resursy. 1988;15(2):24-29, (In Russ.)

11. National Action Plan for the first stage of adaptation to climate change for the period up to 2022. Approved by order of the Government of the Russian Federation of December 25, 2019 No. 3183-p, (In Russ.)

12. Bolgov M. V., Korobkina E. A., Filippova I. A. Bayesian prediction of minimum river runoff under nonstationary conditions of future climate change // Meteorologiya i Gidrologiya. 2016;(7):72-81, (In Russ.)

13. Bolgov M. V. Bayesian evaluation of the change point in the sequences of correlated random variables of hydrometeorological characteristics // Meteorologiya i Gidrologiya. 2021;(10):27-35, (In Russ.), https://doi.org/10.52002/0130-2906-2021-10-27-35

14. WMO report “Atlas of Mortality and Economic Losses from Extreme Meteorological, Climatic and Hydrological Events (1970—2019)”. WMO No. 1267. World Meteorological Organization. 2021, (In Russ.)

15. National Standard of the Russian Federation GOST R 22.10.02-2016 “Safety in emergencies. Emergency risk management. Acceptable risk of an emergency situations”. Approved by Order of the Federal Agency for Technical Regulation and Metrology dated June 29, 2016 No. 274, (In Russ.)

16. Vrijling J. K., van Hengel W., Houben R. J. A framework for risk evaluation // Journal of Hazardous Materials. 43(1995):245-261, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3894(95)91197-V

17. GOST R 22.1.02-95 “Safety in emergencies. Monitoring and forecasting. Terms and definitions”, (In Russ.)

18. Management of risks of man-made disasters and natural disasters (for heads of organizations). Under the general editorship of M. I. Faleev / RNAAR. M.: FSBI VNII GOCHS (FC). 2016. 286 p., (In Russ.)

19. Faleev M. I., Oltyan I.Yu., Arefieva E. V., Bolgov M. V. A methodology and technology for risk assessment based on open data // Issues of Risk Analysis. 2018;15(4):6-19, (In Russ.)

20. Code of Rules SP 104.13330.2016 “Engineering Protection of the Territory from Flooding and Flooding”. Updated version of SNiP 2.06.15-85. Approved by order of the Ministry of Construction, Housing and Communal Services of the Russian Federation dated December 16, 2016 N 964/pr, (In Russ.)

21. Federal Law of December 21, 1994 No. 68-FZ “On the Protection of the Population and Territories from Natural and Man-Made Emergencies”. Adopted by the State Duma on November 11, 1994, (In Russ.)

22. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of April 18, 2014 No. 360, (In Russ.)

23. Federal Law “On Strategic Planning in the Russian Federation” (as amended on July 31, 2020), (In Russ.)

24. Strategic Management / Edited by A. N. Petrov. St. Petersburg: Peter. 2005. 496 p., (In Russ.)

25. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 1235-r of 27.08.2009 (ed. 17.04.2012) “On the Approval of the Water Strategy of the Russian Federation for the Period until 2020”, (In Russ.)

26. Bulletin of the Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation. 2022. No. 5. Water resources. 125 p., (In Russ)


Review

For citations:


Bolgov M.V. Risk analysis of management of water systems in the Russian Federation. Issues of Risk Analysis. 2022;19(6):86-98. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32686/1812-5220-2022-19-6-86-98

Views: 368


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1812-5220 (Print)
ISSN 2658-7882 (Online)