Ways to reduce the risk of loss of soil diversity
https://doi.org/10.32686/1812-5220-2019-16-3-28-40
Abstract
The article is devoted to the problem of reducing the risk of loss of soil diversity in the Russian Federation. The methods of quantitative assessment of the degree of soil degradation are considered. The discussion points of compiling the Red Book of Soil and its difference from the Red Book of plants and animals are analyzed. The main way to preserve the diversity of natural soils is to ensure the representativeness of the system of specially protected natural areas (PA). The representation of soil diversity in the modern network of PA in Russia is estimated (about 56 %). Prevention of soil loss is presented in the form of a triad: a quantitative assessment of the degree of soil degradation, the introduction of endangered natural soils in the Red Books (lists) and the development of proposals for the organization of new PA with the inclusion of “Red Book” soils. Topical issues are the problems of preserving soil diversity in significantly anthropogenically altered regions, as well as determining the minimum area of a protected site that is necessary and sufficient to preserve virgin soil as a specific taxonomic unit.
About the Authors
V. V. Snakin
Lomonosov Moscow State University (Earth Sciences Museum); Institute of Basic Biological Problems of Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Valery V. Snakin
115432, Moscow, Trofimov St., 13, 133
O. V. Chernova
Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution of RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Olga V. Chernova
119071, Moscow, Leninsky Avenue, 33
A. A. Prisyazhnaya
Institute of Basic Biological Problems of RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alla A. Prisyazhnaya
142290, Moscow Region, Pushchino
References
1. Dobrovolsky G. V The Quiet Planet Crisis // Vestnik RAN. 1997. V. 67, No. 4. P. 313—320 (Russia).
2. Down to Earth: Soil degradation and Sustainable Development in Europe — a Challenge for the 21st Century. Environmental Issue Report, 16. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency, 2000.
3. Soils: basic concepts and future challenges. Ed. by Certi-ni, G., Scalenghe, R. Cambridge et al.: Cambridge University Press, 2006. 310 p.
4. Dobrovolsky G. V, Nikitin E. D. Ecology of soils. The doctrine of the ecological functions of the soil. Moscow: Izd-vo Moskovskogo Universiteta, 2012. 415 p. (Russia).
5. Snakin V. V., Prisyazhnaya A. A. The proportion of soil cover in the cost of natural resources // Use and the protection of natural resources in Russia. 2018. № 1. P. 3—10 (Russia).
6. Minashina N. G. Soil degradation // Ecological encyclopedic dictionary. M.: Noosphere, 1999. P. 210— 211 (Russia).
7. Program of Action: Agenda 21 and others documents of the Conference in Rio de Janeiro narrative presentation. Geneva: Center for our common Future, 1993. 70 p. (Russia).
8. Bystritskaya T. L., Nechta L. A., Snakin V V Gumus in soil of steppe biogeocenosis // Soil-biogeoceno-Research in the Azov Sea. Pushchino: ONTI NCBI, 1978. P. 62—69 (Russia).
9. Chernova O.V., Bezuglova O.S. Principles and Features of the Compilation of the Red Data Book of Soils of the Steppe Regions (on Example of the Rostov Oblast) //Arid Ecosystems. 2018. V 8. № 1. С. 40—51 (Russia).
10. Snakin V. V., Prisyazhnaya A. A. Qualitative assessment of the degree of anthropogenic changes in soil by analyzing the in situ composition ofthe soil liquid phase // Geoderma. 1997. V 75 (3—4). P. 279—287.
11. Snakin V.V., Krechetov P.P., Kuzovniko-va T.A. et al. The system for assessing the degree of soil degradations. Preprint. Pushchino: Pushchinsky Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, VNIIPriroda, 1992. 20 p. (Russia).
12. Snakin V. V, Krechetov P. P., Kuzovnikova T. A., Alyabina I. O., Gurov A. F., Stepichev A. V. The system of assessment of soil degradation // Soil technology. 1996. V. 8, No. 4. P. 331—343.
13. Proposal for a European soil monitoring and assessment framework. 2001 /Project manager Gentile A. R. EEA. Copenhagen. 58 p.
14. McKenzie N., Henderson B., McDonald W 2002. Monitoring Soil Change. Principles and practices for Australian conditions. CSIRO Land and Water Technical Report. 112 p.
15. Dobrovolsky G.V., Nikitin E.D., Orlov V.I. The Red Soil Book is needed // Chemistry and Life. 1984. № 6. P. 56—57 (Russia).
16. Krupenikov I. A. The reserves of soil standards and rarities // The Nature Conservancy of Moldova. 1972. Issue 10. P. 46-50 (Russia).
17. Krupenikov, I. A., Red Book and Reserves of Soils // Expanded reproduction of soil fertility in intensive agriculture. M., 1988. P. 12—17 (Russia).
18. Никитин Е. Д. О создании Красной книги почв // Почвоведение. 1989. № 2. С. 113—120. [Nikitin E. D. On the creation of the Red Soil Book // Soil Science. 1989. № 2. P. 113-120 (Russia).]
19. Dobrovolsky G. V., Chernova O. V., Semenyuk O. V., Bogatyrev L. G. Principles of choice of reference objects when creating the Red Book of the soil of Russia // Soil Science. 2006. No. 4. P. 387-395 (Russia).
20. The Red Book of Soils of Russia / Ed. G. V. Dobrovolsky, E. D. Nikitin. Moscow.: MAKS-Press, 2009. 575 p. (Russia).
21. Klimentyev, A.I., Chibilyov, A. A., Blokhin, E. V., Groshev, I. V. The Red Book of Soils of the Orenburg Region. Ekaterinburg: Ural Branch of RAS, 2001. 295 p. (Russia).
22. Solovichenko V. D., Lukin S. V, Lisetsky F. N., Goleusov P. V Red Book of Soils of the Belgorod Region. Belgorod: Publishing house of Bel-SU, 2007. 190 p. (Russia).
23. Aleksandrova A. B., Berezhnov N. A., Grigoryan B. R. et al. The Red Book of Soils of the Republic of Tatarstan. Kazan: Publishing House Foliant, 2012. 192 p. (Russia).
24. Soil map of the RSFSR. Scale 1: 2,500,000 / Ed. by V. M. Friedland. M.: GUGK, 1988 (Russia).
25. Prisyazhnaya A. A., Chernova O. V, Snakin V. V. The Soil Diversity of the Reserve System of Russia // Use and protection of natural resources in Russia. 2017. No. 2. P. 13—18 (Russia).
26. Chernova O. V On the creation of the Red Book of the soils of the chernozem zone of Russia // Soil Science. 2002. No. 12. P. 1495—1500 (Russia).
Review
For citations:
Snakin V.V., Chernova O.V., Prisyazhnaya A.A. Ways to reduce the risk of loss of soil diversity. Issues of Risk Analysis. 2019;16(3):28-40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32686/1812-5220-2019-16-3-28-40
Views:
653
Email this article 