<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">proanaris</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Проблемы анализа риска</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Issues of Risk Analysis</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1812-5220</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2658-7882</issn><publisher><publisher-name>ФГБУ ВНИИ ГОЧС (ФЦ)</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32686/1812-5220-2019-16-5-40-61</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">proanaris-321</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>РИСКИ СЕКТОРОВ ЭКОНОМИКИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>RISKS OF SECTORS OF ECONOMY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Влияние риска на распределение ресурсов в секторах экономики и индустриализацию</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Risk impact on resource distribution in sectors of economics and industrialization</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Сухарев</surname><given-names>О. С.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Sukharev</surname><given-names>O. S.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>доктор экономических наук, профессор, главный научный сотрудник</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">o_sukharev@list.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Ворончихина</surname><given-names>Е. Н.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Voronchikhina</surname><given-names>E. N.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>ассистент кафедры мировой и региональной экономики, экономической теории</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">envoronchikhina@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Институт экономики РАН</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Institute economies of RAS</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-2"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Пермский государственный национальный исследовательский университет</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Perm State National Research University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2019</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>03</day><month>11</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>16</volume><issue>5</issue><fpage>40</fpage><lpage>61</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Сухарев О.С., Ворончихина Е.Н., 2019</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2019</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Сухарев О.С., Ворончихина Е.Н.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Sukharev O.S., Voronchikhina E.N.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.risk-journal.com/jour/article/view/321">https://www.risk-journal.com/jour/article/view/321</self-uri><abstract><p>Цель исследования  — влияние риска хозяйственной деятельности, сосредоточенной в секторах экономики, на распределение ресурсов между секторами, изменение инвестиций в новые и старые технологии, технологичность и создаваемую валовую добавленную стоимость, темп ее роста. Количественная оценка риска осуществляется по стандартному квадратичному отклонению валовой прибыли в секторах и в российской экономике. Технологичность определяется соотношением производства на новых и старых технологиях, причем новые технологии представляют собой вновь созданные передовые технологии. Методологию исследования составляет структурный анализ, позволяющий представить российскую экономику в виде дихотомии секторов — обрабатывающего и трансакционно-сырьевого. Данная дихотомия применена в силу необходимой оценки хода индустриализации и влияния риска в обрабатывающем секторе на динамику общего и специального критериев индустриализации. Результат исследования состоит в том, что подтверждено положительное влияние понижения риска в обрабатывающем секторе на изменение его технологичности и улучшение параметров индустриализации экономики. Учитывая связь доходности в  секторах экономики и  риска ведения хозяйственной деятельности в  них, получены итоговые соотношения для уровней доходности и  риска в  двух секторах, позволяющие дать наилучший темп их развития и общую динамику валовой добавленной стоимости российской экономики, при осуществлении процесса индустриализации. Соотношение риска в обрабатывающем и трансакционно-сырьевом секторах должно быть менее установленной в исследовании величины (1,3), чтобы динамика была наилучшей. Это потребует мер по снижению риска в обрабатывающем секторе, причем, по всей видимости, национальные проекты и гарантии государства в этой части выполняют функцию демпфирования рисков. В трансакционном секторе риск, видимо, не должен понижаться (задача его повышения выглядит экстраординарно), чтобы соотношение рисков влияло на распределение инвестиций, капитала и труда между секторами в направлении обеспечения наилучшего вклада секторов в общую динамику экономики.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The purpose of the study is the impact of the risk of economic activity, which is concentrated in the sectors of the economy, on the distribution of resources between sectors, the change in investment in new and old technologies, the manufacturability and the gross value added created, the themes of its growth. Quantitative risk assessment is carried out by the standard square deviation of gross profit in the sectors and in the Russian economy. Manufacturability is determined by the ratio of production on new and old technologies, and new technologies are newly created advanced technologies. The research methodology is a structural analysis that allows the Russian economy to be represented in the form of a dichotomy of the sectors — processing and transactional raw materials. This dichotomy is applied due to the necessary assessment of the course of industrialization and the influence of risk in processing on the dynamics of general and special coefficients of industrialization. The result of the study is that the positive effect of reducing the risk in the manufacturing sector on the change in its manufacturability and improvement of the parameters of industrialization of the economy has been confirmed. Taking into account the relationship of profitability in the sectors of the economy and the risk of doing business in them, the resulting ratios for the levels of profitability and risk in the two sectors were obtained, which give the best pace of their development and the overall dynamics of the gross value added of the Russian economy during the industrialization process. The ratio of risk in the processing and raw materials sector should be less established in the study of the value (1.3) for the dynamics to be the best. This will require measures to reduce the risk in the manufacturing sector, and, most likely, national projects and state guarantees, in this part, perform the function of damping risks. In the transaction sector, risk apparently should not be reduced (the task of raising it looks extraordinary) so that the risk ratio influences the distribution of investment, capital and labor between the sectors in order to ensure the best contribution of the sectors to the overall dynamics of the economy.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>риск</kwd><kwd>экономический сектор</kwd><kwd>индустриализация</kwd><kwd>темп роста</kwd><kwd>технологичность</kwd><kwd>инвестиции</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>risk</kwd><kwd>economic sector</kwd><kwd>industrialization</kwd><kwd>growth rate</kwd><kwd>manufacturability</kwd><kwd>investment</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Абалкин Л. И. Самоопределение России. М.: Наука, 2005. 486 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Abalkin L. I. Self-Determination of Russia. M.: Science, 2005. 486 p. (Russia)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Глазьев С. Ю. Битва за лидерство в XXI веке. Россия, США, Китай. Семь вариантов ближайшего будущего. М.: Книжный мир. 2017. 890 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Glazyev S. Yu. Battle for leadership in the XXI century. Russia, USA and China. Seven options for the near future. M.: Book world. 2017. 890 p. (Russia)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Доклад НИУ ВШЭ: Структурная политика в России: новые условия и возможная повестка // Вопросы экономики. 2018. № 6. С. 5—28.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">HSE report: Structural policy in Russia: new conditions and possible agenda / Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2018. № 6. P. 5—28. (Russia)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сухарев О. С. Теория реструктуризации экономики. М.: Ленанд, 2016. 256 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sukharev O. S. The theory of economic restructuring. M.: Lenand, 2016. 256 p. (Russia)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сухарев О. С., Ворончихина Е. Н. Стратегия индустриализации экономики. Исследование структуры экономического роста и технологического обновления. М.: Ленанд, 2019. 320 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sukharev O. S., Voronchikhina E. N. Strategy of industrialization of the economy. Study of the structure of economic growth and technological renewal. M.: Lenand, 2019. 320 p. (Russia)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сухарев О. С., Ворончихина Е. Н. Факторы экономического роста: эмпирический анализ индустриализации и инвестиции в технологическое обновление // Вопросы экономики, 2018. № 6. С. 29—47. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-6-29-47</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sukharev O. S., Voronchikhina E. N. Factors of economic growth: Empirical analysis of industrialization and investments in technological upgrade / Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2018. № 6 P. 29—47. (Russia) https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-6-29-47</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шумпетер Й. Теория экономического развития. Капитализм, социализм и демократия. М.: Эксмо. 2007. 892 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schumpeter J. A. The theory of economic development. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. M.: Eksmo. 2007. 892 p. (Russia)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Alonso-Carrera J., Raurich X. Demand-based structural change and balanced economic growth. Journal of Macroeconomics, 2015. Vol. 46, December, pp. 359—374.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Alonso-Carrera J., Raurich X. Demand-based structural change and balanced economic growth. Journal of Macroeconomics, 2015. Vol. 46, December, pp. 359—374.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bernile G., Bhagwat V., Yonker S. Board diversity, ﬁrm risk, and corporate policies // Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 127, Issue 3, 2018, pp. 588—612.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bernile G., Bhagwat V., Yonker S. Board diversity, ﬁrm risk, and corporate policies // Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 127, Issue 3, 2018, pp. 588—612.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dittmar R. F., Lundblad C. T. Firm characteristics, consumption risk, and ﬁrm-level risk exposures // Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 125, Issue 2, 2017, pp. 326—343.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dittmar R. F., Lundblad C. T. Firm characteristics, consumption risk, and ﬁrm-level risk exposures // Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 125, Issue 2, 2017, pp. 326—343.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Guasoni P., Wang G. Consumption and investment with interest rate risk // Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Vol. 476, Issue 1, 2019, pp. 215—239.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Guasoni P., Wang G. Consumption and investment with interest rate risk // Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Vol. 476, Issue 1, 2019, pp. 215—239.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Li J-C., Mei D-C. The returns and risks of investment portfolio in a ﬁnancial market. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2014, Volume 406, pp. 67—72.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Li J-C., Mei D-C. The returns and risks of investment portfolio in a ﬁnancial market. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2014, Volume 406, pp. 67—72.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lukason O., Laitinen E. K. Firm failure processes and components of failure risk: An analysis of European bankrupt ﬁrms // Journal of Business Research, Vol. 98, 2019, pp. 380—390.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lukason O., Laitinen E. K. Firm failure processes and components of failure risk: An analysis of European bankrupt ﬁrms // Journal of Business Research, Vol. 98, 2019, pp. 380—390.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Markowitz H., Dijk E. Chapter 4: Risk-return analysis. Handbook of Asset and Liability Management, 2008. Vol. 1, pp. 139—197.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Markowitz H., Dijk E. Chapter 4: Risk-return analysis. Handbook of Asset and Liability Management, 2008. Vol. 1, pp. 139—197.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nkeki C. I. Optimal investment risks and debt management with backup security in a ﬁnancial crisis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2018. Vol. 338, pp. 129—152.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nkeki C. I. Optimal investment risks and debt management with backup security in a ﬁnancial crisis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2018. Vol. 338, pp. 129—152.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Samaniego R. M., Sun J. Y. Productivity growth and structural transformation. Review of Economic Dynamics, 2016. Vol. 21, July, pp. 266—285.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Samaniego R. M., Sun J. Y. Productivity growth and structural transformation. Review of Economic Dynamics, 2016. Vol. 21, July, pp. 266—285.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shinzato T. Maximizing and minimizing investment concentration with constraints of budget and investment risk // Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Vol. 490, 2018, pp. 986—993.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shinzato T. Maximizing and minimizing investment concentration with constraints of budget and investment risk // Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Vol. 490, 2018, pp. 986—993.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Romano L., Traù F. The nature of industrial development and the speed of structural change. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2017. Vol. 42, No. pp. 26—37.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Romano L., Traù F. The nature of industrial development and the speed of structural change. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2017. Vol. 42, No. pp. 26—37.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Vu K. M. Structural change and economic growth: Empirical evidence and policy insights from Asian economies. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2017. Vol. 41, June, pp. 64—77.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vu K. M. Structural change and economic growth: Empirical evidence and policy insights from Asian economies. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2017. Vol. 41, June, pp. 64—77.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
